Plaintiff was injured in a car accident. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her economic damages but not noneconomic damages. The court held that: (1) the award of zero economic damages did not conflict with the jury’s answers to the interrogatories; (2) the award was not inadequate as a matter law; and (3) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the verdict due to procedural irregularities. Thus, affirming the judgment of the trial court.
Related Posts:
