The plaintiff brought this action forward seeking damages from the defendant for medical malpractice causing partial amputation of the plaintiff’s feet. The plaintiff identified Dr. Gorman, an expert on standard of care and causation, as their expert witness. The plaintiff later filed an amended expert witness disclosure. The trial court denied the defendant’s motion to preclude the amended disclosure. The court did however preclude the plaintiff from disclosing any additional experts after that point. The plaintiff later filed a motion for reargument and requested that the trial court reconsider precluding the plaintiff from bringing forward any new witnesses. The plaintiff then filed another expert witness disclosure identifying an additional witness. The court denied that plaintiff’s motions, sustaining the court’s prior order precluding the plaintiff from bringing forward any additional expert witnesses. The trial court additionally precluded the plaintiff from using expert testimony offered by Dr. Gorman. The court subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant.
Related Posts:
Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws
This post deals with Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws. When should I see a lawyer? Can I resolve this myself?
What to Do Following a Glastonbury Burn Injury
Burn injuries can be severe and lead to long-term effects. Some of the common causes of burns are fire, chemicals,
Legal Aspects of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases in Manchester
Catastrophic injuries are always going to be a concern, especially for those who are engaged in strenuous physical
Glastonbury Car Accident Damages
An auto collision can cause significant injuries and property damage. The expenses incurred by these damages are often