Plaintiff was injured when a robotic camera used during a robotic hysterectomy surgery performed at the defendant hospital fell on her left side. Motion to dismiss was granted because the plaintiff did not include a certificate of good faith in her complaint pursuant to § 52-190a. Court held that due to the lack of facts in the complaint regarding the third prong of the Trimel test and its duty to construe the allegations most favorable to the pleader it was constrained to remand the matter to the trial court.
Related Posts:
Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws
This post deals with Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws. When should I see a lawyer? Can I resolve this myself?
What to Do Following a Glastonbury Burn Injury
Burn injuries can be severe and lead to long-term effects. Some of the common causes of burns are fire, chemicals,
Legal Aspects of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases in Manchester
Catastrophic injuries are always going to be a concern, especially for those who are engaged in strenuous physical
Glastonbury Car Accident Damages
An auto collision can cause significant injuries and property damage. The expenses incurred by these damages are often